Foram encontradas 505 questões.
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
The sentence “The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program” can be correctly replaced by The test is a step back for its experimental Birdwatch program without changing its meaning.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
In the text, the words “misinformation”, “misleading” and “helpfulness” are formed by adding a prefix and a suffix to the base word or root word.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
In the sentence “Users in the test group will see a message inviting them”, “them” can be correctly replaced by they.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
In line, the pronoun “its” refers to Twitter.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
In the sentence “Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets” “other’s” is an example of the genitive case.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
Contributors can write notes on any Tweet and other users can rate that note as helpful.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
There will be test groups checking misleading tweets all over the globe.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
Any user in Twitter will be able to add correcting notes to each other’s tweets.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
Birdwatch is an experimental program that aims to create a better informed platform.
Provas
To fight misinformation, Twitter expands project to let users fact-check each other’s tweets.
For the first time, some ordinary users will see fact-checking notes written by volunteers in the site’s Birdwatch program.
Twitter will begin showing fact-checking notes, submitted by volunteers, on potentially misleading tweets to a small fraction of its users in a test in the United States this week.
The test is a step forward for its experimental Birdwatch program, which seeks to enlist Twitter’s users to flag and debunk misinformation on the social platform.
Users in the test group will see a message inviting them to click for more context when they encounter a tweet that has been flagged by a volunteer fact-checker participating in Birdwatch. There, they’ll find one or more notes written by Birdwatch contributors, correcting or adding
relevant background to the tweet itself, and ideally citing reliable outside sources. They’ll then be asked to rate the note’s helpfulness — ratings that in turn are used to determine whether to continue showing that note to others on Twitter.
Internet: <www.washingtonpost.com/technology> (adapted).
Judge the item from according to the text and general grammar knowledge.
As part of its Birdwatch program, Twitter is going to show some notes written by volunteers in order to avoid inaccurate information.
Provas
Caderno Container