Foram encontradas 40 questões.
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Gramática - Língua InglesaPalavras conectivas | Connective words
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Na abordagem da tipologia dos conteúdos de aprendizagem, Antoni Zabala (1998) propõe três categorias principais: conteúdos factuais ou conceituais, conteúdos procedimentais e conteúdos atitudinais. De acordo com Zabala (1998), ao apresentar um exemplo de conteúdo atitudinal, é CORRETO:
Fonte: ZABALA, Antoni. A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1998.
Fonte: ZABALA, Antoni. A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1998.
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Autores da EducaçãoPiaget
- PsicopedagogiaTeorias do desenvolvimento e da aprendizagemPiaget: Psicologia Genética
As teorias da aprendizagem consistem em teorias que procuram explicar o fenômeno da aprendizagem, tendo historicamente sido influenciadas por outros campos do pensamento. A respeito das teorias da aprendizagem, é CORRETO afirmar que:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Avaliação EducacionalModalidades de Avaliação
- Avaliação EducacionalAvaliação Escolar e suas Implicações Pedagógicas
- Autores da EducaçãoLuckesi
Considere o excerto a seguir a respeito da avaliação da aprendizagem.
“O ato de avaliar, devido a estar a serviço da obtenção do melhor resultado possível, antes de mais nada, implica a disposição de acolher. Isso significa a possibilidade de tomar uma situação da forma como se apresenta, seja ela satisfatória ou insatisfatória, agradável ou desagradável, bonita ou feia. Ela é assim, nada mais. Acolhê-la como está é o ponto de partida para se fazer qualquer coisa que possa ser feita com ela. Avaliar um educando implica, antes de mais nada, acolhê-lo no seu ser e no seu modo de ser, como está, para, a partir daí, decidir o que fazer” (Luckesi, 2000, p. 6).
Fonte: LUCKESI, Cipriano Carlos. O que é mesmo o ato de avaliar a aprendizagem? Revista Pátio, v. 12, p. 6-11, 2000.
A respeito da avaliação da aprendizagem, considerando o que afirma Luckesi (2000) no excerto destacado, analise as asserções a seguir.
I- Na avaliação diagnóstica, o papel do professor é de agente de controle e de julgamento.
II- Na avaliação diagnóstica, o “juízo de qualidade” consiste em verificar o quão satisfatória está a aprendizagem em relação a um padrão conhecido.
III- Para ser verdadeiramente diagnóstica, a avaliação da aprendizagem deve consistir num ato de acolhimento.
É CORRETO o que se afirma em:
“O ato de avaliar, devido a estar a serviço da obtenção do melhor resultado possível, antes de mais nada, implica a disposição de acolher. Isso significa a possibilidade de tomar uma situação da forma como se apresenta, seja ela satisfatória ou insatisfatória, agradável ou desagradável, bonita ou feia. Ela é assim, nada mais. Acolhê-la como está é o ponto de partida para se fazer qualquer coisa que possa ser feita com ela. Avaliar um educando implica, antes de mais nada, acolhê-lo no seu ser e no seu modo de ser, como está, para, a partir daí, decidir o que fazer” (Luckesi, 2000, p. 6).
Fonte: LUCKESI, Cipriano Carlos. O que é mesmo o ato de avaliar a aprendizagem? Revista Pátio, v. 12, p. 6-11, 2000.
A respeito da avaliação da aprendizagem, considerando o que afirma Luckesi (2000) no excerto destacado, analise as asserções a seguir.
I- Na avaliação diagnóstica, o papel do professor é de agente de controle e de julgamento.
II- Na avaliação diagnóstica, o “juízo de qualidade” consiste em verificar o quão satisfatória está a aprendizagem em relação a um padrão conhecido.
III- Para ser verdadeiramente diagnóstica, a avaliação da aprendizagem deve consistir num ato de acolhimento.
É CORRETO o que se afirma em:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Currículo (Teoria e Prática)
- Temas Educacionais PedagógicosTendências Pedagógicas
- Currículo: planejamento, seleção e organização dos conteúdos
Segundo a tendência crítico-social dos conteúdos, também conhecida por “pedagogia dos conteúdos”, a escola deve ser instrumento de transformação social. Sobre como esta tendência compreende o papel dos conteúdos escolares, é CORRETO afirmar que os conteúdos escolares:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Currículo (Teoria e Prática)Currículo, interdisciplinaridade, transversalidade e a transdisciplinaridade
- Temas Educacionais PedagógicosPolíticas PúblicasProgramas e Ações do Ministério da Educação - Desenvolvimento da Educação Básica
- Políticas Educacionais
- Organização e Estrutura dos Sistemas de Ensino no Brasil
“A Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC) é um documento de caráter normativo que define o conjunto orgânico e progressivo de aprendizagens essenciais que todos os alunos devem desenvolver ao longo das etapas e modalidades da Educação Básica, de modo a que tenham assegurados seus direitos de aprendizagem e desenvolvimento, em conformidade com o que preceitua o Plano Nacional de Educação (PNE)”.
Fonte: BRASIL. Ministério da Educação.Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília: MEC, 2018.
O excerto acima faz parte da introdução do texto integral da Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC). Sobre a BNCC, observado o excerto destacado, analise as assertivas a seguir.
I- Na BNCC, compreende-se competência como a mobilização de conhecimentos, habilidades, atitudes e valores na resolução das demandas da vida.
II- Na BNCC, o conceito de educação integral refere-se ao tempo de permanência na escola, nos termos da lei que instituiu a reforma do Ensino Médio, em 2017.
III- O uso de “componentes curriculares” em vez de “disciplinas”, na BNCC, opõe-se à ideia de fragmentação do conhecimento, enfatizando a integração dos conhecimentos.
É CORRETO o que se afirma em:
Fonte: BRASIL. Ministério da Educação.Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília: MEC, 2018.
O excerto acima faz parte da introdução do texto integral da Base Nacional Comum Curricular (BNCC). Sobre a BNCC, observado o excerto destacado, analise as assertivas a seguir.
I- Na BNCC, compreende-se competência como a mobilização de conhecimentos, habilidades, atitudes e valores na resolução das demandas da vida.
II- Na BNCC, o conceito de educação integral refere-se ao tempo de permanência na escola, nos termos da lei que instituiu a reforma do Ensino Médio, em 2017.
III- O uso de “componentes curriculares” em vez de “disciplinas”, na BNCC, opõe-se à ideia de fragmentação do conhecimento, enfatizando a integração dos conhecimentos.
É CORRETO o que se afirma em:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container