Foram encontradas 40 questões.
As necessidades de treinamento, quando identificadas, se referem:
I - ao planejamento exigido para o pleno exercício do cargo;
II - à diferença entre o que uma pessoa deveria saber e fazer e aquilo que ela realmente sabe e faz;
III - aos conhecimentos e habilidades que um indivíduo ou grupo precisa desenvolver para melhorar ou aumentar sua eficiência, eficácia e produtividade no trabalho.
Assinale a alternativa certa:
Provas
Como a pesquisa salarial envolve custos operacionais e tempo, muitas empresas preferem recorrer:
I – a empresas de consultoria de RH, que fazem pesquisas contínuas sobre um amplo conjunto de cargos;
II – à verificação de resultados de pesquisas em jornais, que são vendidos no mercado;
III – ao manual do Datafolha, que é publicado mensalmente.
Assinale a alternativa certa:
Provas
Dentre as atividades de pesquisa salarial, para não precisar trocar informações a respeito de todos os cargos, torna-se necessário:
Provas
Enquanto a descrição de cargos é um ato de arrolar tarefas ou atribuições, a análise de cargos envolve:
I – a determinação ideal do perfil do ocupante, através do qual deverá ser selecionado o candidato com aptidão para ocupá-lo;
II – a verificação de quais são os requisitos intelectuais e físicos que o ocupante deverá ter para se desempenhar adequadamente o cargo;
III – a verificação de quais são as políticas envolvidas e as estratégias de trabalho em relação ao desempenho no cargo.
Assinale a opção certa:
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
The word spiking in “spiking oil prices” suggests a movement that:
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
The underlined expression in “Alternative energies would save us money in the long run “ means:
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
When the writer refers to “the burden of coping”, she implies, among other issues, that future generations will have to:
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK
Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
The author of this letter considers the revival of nuclear energy:
Provas
Here is the beginning of a piece of news:
A group of U.S. Senators visited Brazil in August
to take a look at the country’s ethanol industry.
“It was a real eye-opener. I was just amazed what
we learned,” said Sen. Mel Martinez ( R-Fla).
What most impressed the delegation was the
choice Brazilians have at the pump. Since the
1973 oil embargo, Brazil has battled to achieve
energy independence, replacing gasoline with
ethanol, an alcohol distilled from sugarcane…
In Brazil ethanol, or ‘alcool” as it is called, costs
only $2 at the pump, compared to $4 for a gasoline-
ethanol blend ( Brazil no longer sells regular
unblended gasoline). And while ethanol-powered
cars consume 25% to 30% more fuel per mile than
gasoline cars, the average motorist can save about
$820 a year by switching to ethanol.
(from www.forbes.com/2005/11/15/energy-ethanol-
brazil_ cx_1116energy_adams)
while in “while ethanol-powered cars consume 25% to 30% more fuel per mile than gasoline cars, “ is used in the same way as in:
Provas
Here is the beginning of a piece of news:
A group of U.S. Senators visited Brazil in August
to take a look at the country’s ethanol industry.
“It was a real eye-opener. I was just amazed what
we learned,” said Sen. Mel Martinez ( R-Fla).
What most impressed the delegation was the
choice Brazilians have at the pump. Since the
1973 oil embargo, Brazil has battled to achieve
energy independence, replacing gasoline with
ethanol, an alcohol distilled from sugarcane…
In Brazil ethanol, or ‘alcool” as it is called, costs
only $2 at the pump, compared to $4 for a gasoline-
ethanol blend ( Brazil no longer sells regular
unblended gasoline). And while ethanol-powered
cars consume 25% to 30% more fuel per mile than
gasoline cars, the average motorist can save about
$820 a year by switching to ethanol.
(from www.forbes.com/2005/11/15/energy-ethanol-
brazil_ cx_1116energy_adams)
The fact that “Brazil has battled to achieve energy independence” means that this action has been:
Provas
Caderno Container