Magna Concursos

Foram encontradas 46.262 questões.

4125972 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
During a policy symposium on digital governance in education, a senior advisor stated: “Teachers are navigating unprecedented epistemological shifts, and we must ensure that they receive sustained institutional support if AI is to enhance rather than erode pedagogical integrity.” (Excerpt adapted from: MIT Technology Review [2023].
“How Generative AI Is Reshaping Education”) In formally reporting the advisor’s statement within an academic article written after the event, the grammatically accurate and contextually appropriate transformation would be:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125971 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
“In policy roundtables, numerous educators have articulated that they wish institutional investment in sustained AI training ______ more systematic, less episodic, and insulated from shifting political agendas.” (Excerpt adapted from: Harvard Graduate School of Education [2023]. “Preparing Teachers for an AI-Driven Future”) The verb form that correctly expresses present regret concerning an unreal state is:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125970 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
“Teachers, ______ professional discernment and pedagogical autonomy remain indispensable within AI-augmented classrooms, must be regarded not as peripheral implementers of policy but as central agents in shaping ethically responsible digital futures.” (Excerpt adapted from: The Conversation [2024]. “Teachers Are Key to Students’ AI Literacy”)
The correct relative determiner that completes the clause is:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125969 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
“It has been widely acknowledged that, in the absence of robust regulatory oversight, vast repositories of student-generated data ______ in ways that neither educators nor families are able to scrutinize effectively.” (Excerpt adapted from: World Economic Forum [2020]. “Shaping the Future of Learning”)
The grammatically accurate passive construction expressing epistemic possibility is:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125968 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
“Educational leaders must evaluate ______ the epistemological transformations prompted by AImediated instruction ______ the ethical, legal, and socio-economic ramifications that accompany its systemic integration into formal schooling structures.” (Excerpt adapted from: Brookings Institution [2022]. “AI in Education: Promise and Pitfalls”)
The correlative structure that ensures syntactic parallelism and semantic coordination between equivalent noun phrases is:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125967 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
“Over the past decade, adaptive AI-driven assessment models ______ at an unprecedented pace, progressively reshaping pedagogical methodologies, accountability metrics, and evaluative paradigms across diverse educational jurisdictions.” (Excerpt adapted from: OECD [2021]. “AI and the Future of Skills”)
The verbal phrase that most accurately foregrounds continuity to the present moment is:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125966 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
“If generative AI systems ______ implemented across public education systems without a concomitant expansion of teacher training frameworks and regulatory safeguards, the resulting asymmetries in access and digital literacy may well intensify pre-existing structural inequities rather than mitigate them.” (Excerpt adapted from: UNESCO [2023]. “Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research”)
The conditional construction that most appropriately conveys formal contingency in institutional discourse is:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125965 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
     With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom reality. The public, including many students, now has widespread access to GenAI tools and large language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use these tools with schoolwork. School boards have taken different approaches to regulating or integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers, meanwhile, find themselves responding to these paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and wider expectations AI raises.
     There are many questions about the purpose of education, including questions around academic integrity and how education can uphold fairness and equity. Questions include: How can students successfully navigate the use of these tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can schools prepare students for the future as organizations and institutions scramble to determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide students as they grapple with the existential and social implications of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this complex challenge alone — they need support and to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important role.
      There’s a growing international consensus echoed by calls to action that teachers are essential players as learners develop AI literacy. Despite growing resources, the development of AI technology continues to outpace implementation support and essential training for teachers. This widening gap between teacher competencies and the demands of an AI-infused classroom is unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers to guide the next generation in a world transformed by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide students and shape students’ critical and responsible engagement with this technology.
      Teachers cannot do this alone. Successfully integrating AI into education requires a concerted and collaborative effort from all stakeholders within the educational ecosystem. Together, these partners can help establish clear, strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate robust funding for essential tools and comprehensive training and research to foster innovative spaces where educators and researchers can experiment and study practices. Research is needed to assess the broader effects of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across all jurisdictions.
    Implementation should also consider teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities that teachers carry. What can be removed, and what robust supports can be provided so teachers can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to recognize that investing in teachers is one of the most powerful ways we can invest in our students and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
Throughout the text, the author progressively moves from describing the rapid expansion of generative AI in education (paragraph 1), to raising ethical and pedagogical concerns (paragraph 2), to identifying systemic gaps in training (paragraph 3), and finally to advocating coordinated policy investment (paragraphs 4 and 5). This progression indicates that the author’s primary argumentative strategy consists of:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125964 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
     With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom reality. The public, including many students, now has widespread access to GenAI tools and large language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use these tools with schoolwork. School boards have taken different approaches to regulating or integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers, meanwhile, find themselves responding to these paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and wider expectations AI raises.
     There are many questions about the purpose of education, including questions around academic integrity and how education can uphold fairness and equity. Questions include: How can students successfully navigate the use of these tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can schools prepare students for the future as organizations and institutions scramble to determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide students as they grapple with the existential and social implications of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this complex challenge alone — they need support and to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important role.
      There’s a growing international consensus echoed by calls to action that teachers are essential players as learners develop AI literacy. Despite growing resources, the development of AI technology continues to outpace implementation support and essential training for teachers. This widening gap between teacher competencies and the demands of an AI-infused classroom is unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers to guide the next generation in a world transformed by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide students and shape students’ critical and responsible engagement with this technology.
      Teachers cannot do this alone. Successfully integrating AI into education requires a concerted and collaborative effort from all stakeholders within the educational ecosystem. Together, these partners can help establish clear, strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate robust funding for essential tools and comprehensive training and research to foster innovative spaces where educators and researchers can experiment and study practices. Research is needed to assess the broader effects of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across all jurisdictions.
    Implementation should also consider teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities that teachers carry. What can be removed, and what robust supports can be provided so teachers can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to recognize that investing in teachers is one of the most powerful ways we can invest in our students and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
In paragraph 1, the text refers to “these paradigm shifts”. Considering the context of the passage, the expression “paradigm shifts” is most nearly synonymous with: A ( ) incremental
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4125963 Ano: 2026
Disciplina: Inglês (Língua Inglesa)
Banca: IBAM
Orgão: Pref. Armação Búzios-RJ
Provas:
     With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), teachers have been thrust into a new and ever-shifting classroom reality. The public, including many students, now has widespread access to GenAI tools and large language models (LLMs). Students sometimes use these tools with schoolwork. School boards have taken different approaches to regulating or integrating tech in classrooms. Teachers, meanwhile, find themselves responding to these paradigm shifts while juggling student needs and wider expectations AI raises.
     There are many questions about the purpose of education, including questions around academic integrity and how education can uphold fairness and equity. Questions include: How can students successfully navigate the use of these tools safely, effectively and ethically? How can schools prepare students for the future as organizations and institutions scramble to determine how to respond to or integrate aspects of AI? Will harnessing AI’s potential impact critical thinking and other cognitive skills? Teachers are uniquely positioned to help guide students as they grapple with the existential and social implications of AI alongside practical concerns for their own and students’ futures. Teachers cannot face this complex challenge alone — they need support and to feel skilled and empowered to fulfil this important role.
      There’s a growing international consensus echoed by calls to action that teachers are essential players as learners develop AI literacy. Despite growing resources, the development of AI technology continues to outpace implementation support and essential training for teachers. This widening gap between teacher competencies and the demands of an AI-infused classroom is unsustainable. This is not merely about keeping pace with technology; it’s about equipping teachers to guide the next generation in a world transformed by AI. By empowering teachers with skills and confidence in AI use, they can continue to guide students and shape students’ critical and responsible engagement with this technology.
      Teachers cannot do this alone. Successfully integrating AI into education requires a concerted and collaborative effort from all stakeholders within the educational ecosystem. Together, these partners can help establish clear, strategic mandates for AI integration and dedicate robust funding for essential tools and comprehensive training and research to foster innovative spaces where educators and researchers can experiment and study practices. Research is needed to assess the broader effects of AI use, for example, on critical thinking and cognitive offloading, to evaluate and understand the impacts of this technology in education. Supports are needed to ensure that AI adoption is not haphazard, but strategic and equitable across all jurisdictions.
    Implementation should also consider teacher burnout and the existing responsibilities that teachers carry. What can be removed, and what robust supports can be provided so teachers can take this on without compromising their wellbeing or effectiveness? It’s time for policymakers to recognize that investing in teachers is one of the most powerful ways we can invest in our students and in a better future for all of us.
Taken and adapted from:
https://theconversation.com/teachers-are-key-to
students-ai-literacy-and-need-support-260390
“There’s a growing international consensus echoed by calls to action that teachers are essential players as learners develop AI literacy. Despite growing resources, the development of AI technology continues to outpace implementation support and essential training for teachers.” (paragraph 3)
The discourse marker “despite” is strategically employed to:
 

Provas

Questão presente nas seguintes provas