Foram encontradas 40 questões.
Considerando e evolução da indústria do gás na Grã-Bretanha de 1982 até a atualidade, podem-se observar as dramáticas mudanças no mercado. Partiu de um monopólio estatal totalmente verticalizado a um sistema totalmente liberal. Entretanto um fato é apontado pelos analistas como o grande erro ( The Big Mistake) do processo. Indique-o dentre as opções abaixo:
Provas
Considere as seguintes afirmativas:
I) A indústria de gás natural no Brasil começou na Bahia na década de 60;
II) CEG no Rio de Janeiro e COMGÁS em São Paulo são as companhias de distribuição de gás mais antigas do país;
III) A descoberta de gás natural na Bacia de Campos, após o início da indústria na Bahia foi o principal agente a impulsionar o crescimento da indústria de gás no Brasil.
Assinale a alternativa correta:
Provas
A Constituição de 1988 alterou profundamente as regras da indústria do gás no Brasil. O fato mais relevante foi:
Provas
Medidas de tendência central é um conceito fundamental em estatística. As mais utilizadas são moda, mediana e média e são assim definidas:
I) Moda é o valor mais freqüente de uma amostra.
II) Média é o ponto abaixo do qual se encontram 50% dos valores da amostra.
III)Mediana é a média aritmética dos valores da amostra.
IV)em uma distribuição normal, moda, mediana e média coincidem.
Assinale a alternativa correta:
Provas
Considere um dado de seis faces, não viciado, contendo cada uma um símbolo que indica números que vão de 1 a 6, sendo um único símbolo em cada face. Faz-se duas jogadas com os seguintes objetivos:
I) em duas jogadas obter o número dois na primeira jogada e o seguido do número cinco na segunda.
II) em duas jogadas obter-se o número cinco e o número dois, não importando a ordem.
As probabilidades de sucesso são, respectivamente:
Provas
O Balanced Scorecard propõe-se a medir a atuação de uma empresa decorrente de sua estratégia. Em geral é apresentado sob quatro perspectivas.
Indique a alternativa que não é uma das perspectivas do Balanced Scorecard.
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
The word spiking in “spiking oil prices” suggests a movement that:
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
The underlined expression in “Alternative energies would save us money in the long run “ means:
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
When the writer refers to “the burden of coping”, she implies, among other issues, that future generations will have to:
Provas
Doubts About Nuclear Energy
Your article “Re-energized”, about the French nuclear-energy company Areva [Nov. 14], noted that there may be a comeback for nuclear power. Even if there is evidence of a “nuclear renaissance”, as Areva's head, Anne Lauvergeon, put it, I can't see nuclear power plants becoming popular in most of Europe. There are still serious problems with handling the drainage of reactor coolant into rivers, and there is the major concern of how to dispose of nuclear waste. Long-distance transport of such material is highly dangerous, especially with the threat of terrorist attacks. And can we place on future generations the burden of coping with tons of hazardous radioactive substances? The reasons for the sudden return of nuclear energy – spiking oil prices and the effect of greenhouse gases – also call for investment in alternative-energy technologies. Wind, solar or water energy could help stop the progress of global warming and make us independent of fossil fuels. Alternative energies would save us money in the long run without the immense drawbacks of nuclear energy.
LISA JANK
Augsburg, Germany
(Time, December 19, 2005, p. 10)
The author of this letter considers the revival of nuclear energy:
Provas
Caderno Container