Foram encontradas 510 questões.
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
- Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
- Gramática - Língua InglesaPalavras conectivas | Connective words
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
TEXTI
The Benefits of a New Space Race
In October 2003 China became only the third nation to launch a human into space aboard its own rocket. Colonel Yang Liwei,
China's first taikonaut, orbited the Earth for barely a day before returning, slightly shaken, to a landing in Mongolia. It was a significant
technical achievement for a country that has been struggling to modernize its economy and its technology, and the Chinese government
trumpeted it to its people and the world. Although Yang's flight received considerable attention around the globe, what was almost
ignored is the fact that after his feet were firmly on the ground, the orbital module from his Shenzhou spacecraft continued to circle the
earth, carrying several military payloads. The module is apparently equipped both with a reconnaissance camera capable of spotting
objects on the ground about a yard long, and an array of antennas for intercepting radar and other signals from hundreds of miles away.
Despite this, Shenzhou is not something the United States should be concerned about, but should actually encourage.
China is pursuing a human space program for three primary reasons: international prestige, domestic pacification, and
industrial policy. A human space program enhances China's status as a major power, at least within the Pacific region. It also feeds
nationalist hunger among the populace, making them proud of the achievements of their country even while they realize that they live
under an authoritarian and corrupt government – bread and circuses for the masses. Finally, a Chinese “white paper” about space makes
clear that the Chinese anticipate numerous technological developments to flow from their space program. Building a space capability
requires improvements in manufacturing, computers and materials that the Chinese hope to use in other areas of their economy.
Because China is a rival to the United States, it is not in American interests to see them gain international prestige, pacify an oppressed
population, or improve their technology.
But now that China has entered the human spaceflight arena, and President Bush has proposed a new exploration plan,
America's best move might be to engage the Chinese in future cooperation in human spaceflight, such as dangling the possibility of
sending future missions to the International Space Station, and possibly even future competition in this realm as well. For several years
the Western science press has been filled with articles about China's space ambitions. Reporters have claimed that China has bold plans
for a large human spaceflight program, including everything from space stations to Moon landings. Many of these reports, however,
have generated bad translations of articles originally published in Chinese, or handwaved away the laws of physics. China's space
ambitions are in reality much less dramatic and the requirements to achieve some of these goals much higher than the press has implied.
Although most of these stories are false, it would be in America's best interest if they are true, and a shrewd strategy to encourage
China's peaceful exploration of space, with humans, is called for.
Human spaceflight is enormously expensive, even in places where labor is cheap. Despite the slow and deliberate pace of the
Chinese human spaceflight program so far, it is clear that China has spent a considerable amount of money to acquire this new
capability – nearly $2 billion. In addition to developing a spacecraft and launching four previous unmanned missions, China has also
built a new rocket, a new launch pad, and a large assembly building for integrating all of the equipment, as well as various other support
facilities, such as a tracking station in Namibia and several tracking ships. Recovery forces such as helicopters and aircraft cost
additional money. China may also demonstrate the value of spaceflight at diverting domestic attention from government oppression
and corruption. But the Chinese government is going to do this anyway with other events, such as the 2008 Olympics. As for China's
industrial policy, the United States long ago learned that the spin-off argument is a weak one; although developing spacecraft does
produce some useful technologies, it is generally inefficient. If you want a faster computer chip, then develop one; there is no need to go
to the Moon to do so. The only demonstrated payoff of human spaceflight is prestige.
Source: Available at: http://www.thespacereview.com/article/137/1. Accessed on: April 30 , 2026. (Adapted.)
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4195599
Ano: 2026
Disciplina: TI - Desenvolvimento de Sistemas
Banca: UEPB
Orgão: Pref. Itabaiana-SE
Disciplina: TI - Desenvolvimento de Sistemas
Banca: UEPB
Orgão: Pref. Itabaiana-SE
Provas:
Em relação às técnicas de levantamento de requisitos para desenvolvimento de software, analise as assertivas a seguir.
I- A amostragem é uma técnica que consiste em selecionar, de forma organizada, parte dos indivíduos ou elementos de uma população (de usuários, por exemplo), de modo que essa parte represente adequadamente o todo e permita a obtenção de informações relevantes sobre o conjunto completo da população.
II- Entrevistas conduzidas com debates amplamente abertos funcionam bem. No entanto, cabe aos interessados (stakeholders) assegurarem que a conversa permaneça direcionada ao software em desenvolvimento, para que desvios de foco sejam evitados.
III- A etnografia é uma técnica na qual a equipe de análise acompanha diretamente o ambiente de trabalho, observando e registrando como as atividades da equipe operacional realmente ocorrem, para compreender o funcionamento prático dos processos a serem considerados no software em desenvolvimento. Essa abordagem pode ser utilizada em conjunto com a prototipação para validar e refinar a compreensão de como o software deve funcionar.
IV- Brainstorm é uma técnica interativa que envolve reuniões estruturadas, com a participação de todos os interessados (stakeholders), e visa discutir ideias, alinhar expectativas e tomar decisões consensuais sobre o software em desenvolvimento.
É CORRETO o que se afirma apenas em:
I- A amostragem é uma técnica que consiste em selecionar, de forma organizada, parte dos indivíduos ou elementos de uma população (de usuários, por exemplo), de modo que essa parte represente adequadamente o todo e permita a obtenção de informações relevantes sobre o conjunto completo da população.
II- Entrevistas conduzidas com debates amplamente abertos funcionam bem. No entanto, cabe aos interessados (stakeholders) assegurarem que a conversa permaneça direcionada ao software em desenvolvimento, para que desvios de foco sejam evitados.
III- A etnografia é uma técnica na qual a equipe de análise acompanha diretamente o ambiente de trabalho, observando e registrando como as atividades da equipe operacional realmente ocorrem, para compreender o funcionamento prático dos processos a serem considerados no software em desenvolvimento. Essa abordagem pode ser utilizada em conjunto com a prototipação para validar e refinar a compreensão de como o software deve funcionar.
IV- Brainstorm é uma técnica interativa que envolve reuniões estruturadas, com a participação de todos os interessados (stakeholders), e visa discutir ideias, alinhar expectativas e tomar decisões consensuais sobre o software em desenvolvimento.
É CORRETO o que se afirma apenas em:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Considerando os diferentes tipos de software e os conceitos relacionados às suas características e definições, é possível classificá-los
de acordo com sua finalidade, forma de distribuição e modo de funcionamento. Assim, é CORRETO afirmar que:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Ao chegar à escola, o professor de informática percebeu que o computador da secretaria não conseguia detectar nenhuma rede Wi-Fi
disponível. Como utiliza o Windows, o professor abriu o Gerenciador de Dispositivos e constatou que o adaptador de rede sem fio
estava listado entre os dispositivos disponíveis, porém havia um ícone de alerta amarelo ao lado do nome do adaptador.
Com base no que o professor constatou, é CORRETO afirmar que o alerta dizia respeito a um problema de:
Com base no que o professor constatou, é CORRETO afirmar que o alerta dizia respeito a um problema de:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4195596
Ano: 2026
Disciplina: TI - Sistemas Operacionais
Banca: UEPB
Orgão: Pref. Itabaiana-SE
Disciplina: TI - Sistemas Operacionais
Banca: UEPB
Orgão: Pref. Itabaiana-SE
Provas:
Para que um sistema operacional funcione de maneira estruturada, execute tarefas com eficiência e assegure a proteção das operações
realizadas, é fundamental que seus quatro componentes essenciais apresentem bom desempenho.
Sobre esses quatro componentes principais, é CORRETO afirmar que dizem respeito ao gerenciamento de:
Sobre esses quatro componentes principais, é CORRETO afirmar que dizem respeito ao gerenciamento de:
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
4195595
Ano: 2026
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: UEPB
Orgão: Pref. Itabaiana-SE
Disciplina: TI - Organização e Arquitetura dos Computadores
Banca: UEPB
Orgão: Pref. Itabaiana-SE
Provas:
A RAM (Random Access Memory) é um tipo de memória utilizada pelo computador para armazenar temporariamente dados e
programas que estão sendo carregados ativamente durante a operação do sistema operacional. Diferentemente de dispositivos de
armazenamento permanente, como discos rígidos ou SSDs (Solid State Drive), a RAM permite que o processador acesse rapidamente
as informações necessárias para executar tarefas, como abrir programas, editar arquivos ou navegar na internet.
Considerando os cenários a seguir, em qual deles está ocorrendo insuficiência de memória RAM?
Considerando os cenários a seguir, em qual deles está ocorrendo insuficiência de memória RAM?
Provas
Questão presente nas seguintes provas
Cadernos
Caderno Container